https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197499 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order of adjudication, emphasizing the availability of an appeal remedy before the Tribunal. The Court held that the appeal process, including the requirement of depositing 7.5% of the tax demand, was not illusory or unreasonable. It concluded that the statutory conditions for appeal were not excessive, warranting no interference in writ jurisdiction. The Court highlighted the importance of utilizing the appellate route rather than seeking relief through writ jurisdiction, ultimately deeming the writ petition misconceived due to the existence of an alternate and effective remedy. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:20:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197499 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order of adjudication, emphasizing the availability of an appeal remedy before the Tribunal. The Court held that the appeal process, including the requirement of depositing 7.5% of the tax demand, was not illusory or unreasonable. It concluded that the statutory conditions for appeal were not excessive, warranting no interference in writ jurisdiction. The Court highlighted the importance of utilizing the appellate route rather than seeking relief through writ jurisdiction, ultimately deeming the writ petition misconceived due to the existence of an alternate and effective remedy. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197499