<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1517 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal could not sanction the Composite Scheme of Arrangement due to the absence of the mandatory auditor&#039;s certificate as required under the Companies Act, 2013. The petitioners were granted a two-week period to obtain and submit the certificate, failing which the petition would be rejected. The matter was scheduled for compliance on 22.05.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1517 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal could not sanction the Composite Scheme of Arrangement due to the absence of the mandatory auditor&#039;s certificate as required under the Companies Act, 2013. The petitioners were granted a two-week period to obtain and submit the certificate, failing which the petition would be rejected. The matter was scheduled for compliance on 22.05.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>