<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing authorities to refund the amount due since August 2006 within three months. Despite the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision, the department failed to process the refund claim. The Tribunal reiterated that the amendment to the Customs Act, 1962 was not retrospective, entitling the appellant to the refund. The department was instructed to promptly make the refund, emphasizing its obligation to follow Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing authorities to refund the amount due since August 2006 within three months. Despite the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision, the department failed to process the refund claim. The Tribunal reiterated that the amendment to the Customs Act, 1962 was not retrospective, entitling the appellant to the refund. The department was instructed to promptly make the refund, emphasizing its obligation to follow Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>