<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 374 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding tax liability for construction activities for a hostel and a hospital. It held that the buildings were for non-commercial use, and turn-key projects should be considered within the works contract service scope. The original order imposing tax liability and penalty was set aside, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment clarified the interpretation of turn-key projects and excluded non-commercial buildings from tax liability under works contract service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 374 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding tax liability for construction activities for a hostel and a hospital. It held that the buildings were for non-commercial use, and turn-key projects should be considered within the works contract service scope. The original order imposing tax liability and penalty was set aside, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment clarified the interpretation of turn-key projects and excluded non-commercial buildings from tax liability under works contract service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>