<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 373 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed disputes on tax liability recovery, Rule 6(2) of Service Tax Rules, and lack of evidence. It directed collaboration between parties and the Chief Commissioner of Service Tax to reconcile facts, ascertain liabilities, and submit a report for further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 373 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed disputes on tax liability recovery, Rule 6(2) of Service Tax Rules, and lack of evidence. It directed collaboration between parties and the Chief Commissioner of Service Tax to reconcile facts, ascertain liabilities, and submit a report for further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>