https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353635 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order against the refinery, finding insufficient evidence to support the demand for unpaid Central Excise duty on Refined Soya Oil. The demand based on third-party records lacked concrete proof of clandestine removal, leading to the conclusion that the allegations were unsustainable. Both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, resulting in the dismissal of duty demands and penalties imposed by the Central Excise Department. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353635 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order against the refinery, finding insufficient evidence to support the demand for unpaid Central Excise duty on Refined Soya Oil. The demand based on third-party records lacked concrete proof of clandestine removal, leading to the conclusion that the allegations were unsustainable. Both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants, resulting in the dismissal of duty demands and penalties imposed by the Central Excise Department. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353635