<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 370 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties on the appellant companies for clandestine clearance of goods without duty payment, citing admission of clearance and duty payment as key factors. However, penalties on the Directors were set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement. The appeals filed by the Revenue were allowed, with assessees given the option to pay penalty at 25% of duty along with full duty and interest within 30 days. Appeals against other respondents were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:16:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 370 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties on the appellant companies for clandestine clearance of goods without duty payment, citing admission of clearance and duty payment as key factors. However, penalties on the Directors were set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement. The appeals filed by the Revenue were allowed, with assessees given the option to pay penalty at 25% of duty along with full duty and interest within 30 days. Appeals against other respondents were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>