<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 349 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353613</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the payment of interest for the period between provisional and final duty assessment. The tribunal held that there was no liability to pay interest during this period as the duty was paid as per provisional assessment and there were no dues to the government before the final assessment. Citing court precedents, the tribunal set aside the department&#039;s demand for interest, concluding that it lacked a legal basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:14:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 349 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353613</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the payment of interest for the period between provisional and final duty assessment. The tribunal held that there was no liability to pay interest during this period as the duty was paid as per provisional assessment and there were no dues to the government before the final assessment. Citing court precedents, the tribunal set aside the department&#039;s demand for interest, concluding that it lacked a legal basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>