<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 347 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not eligible to avail credit on inputs used in the captive power plant for their residential colony and DM water plant. However, credit availed on inputs used in generating electricity for the Grinding Unit and Jetty was deemed admissible. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 347 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not eligible to avail credit on inputs used in the captive power plant for their residential colony and DM water plant. However, credit availed on inputs used in generating electricity for the Grinding Unit and Jetty was deemed admissible. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>