https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353608 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the service tax paid on most input services was admissible for credit, except for services related to gardening and construction work in the township. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the amount of credit availed for certain services and remanded the case for further clarification and adjustments. Penalties for the credit availed on other services were deemed unjustified. en-us Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353608 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the service tax paid on most input services was admissible for credit, except for services related to gardening and construction work in the township. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the amount of credit availed for certain services and remanded the case for further clarification and adjustments. Penalties for the credit availed on other services were deemed unjustified. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353608