https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353606 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT credit for insurance premium on capital goods used at a different location for manufacturing vehicles. The tribunal criticized the authorities for insufficient reasoning and lack of detailed analysis, emphasizing the appellant's legal right to claim such credit for expenses related to manufacturing activities at distinct locations. The decision highlighted the importance of consistent adjudication principles and the necessity for thorough consideration of specific case facts. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:14:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353606 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT credit for insurance premium on capital goods used at a different location for manufacturing vehicles. The tribunal criticized the authorities for insufficient reasoning and lack of detailed analysis, emphasizing the appellant's legal right to claim such credit for expenses related to manufacturing activities at distinct locations. The decision highlighted the importance of consistent adjudication principles and the necessity for thorough consideration of specific case facts. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353606