<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 27 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11344</link>
    <description>The court condoned the delay in re-filing appeals and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that assessment orders under section 144 of the Income-tax Act were unsustainable due to improper service of notice under section 142(1) of the Act. The court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the significance of proper notice service in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 27 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11344</link>
      <description>The court condoned the delay in re-filing appeals and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that assessment orders under section 144 of the Income-tax Act were unsustainable due to improper service of notice under section 142(1) of the Act. The court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing the significance of proper notice service in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>