<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 540 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197490</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s claims regarding the sale of the property, reconstitution of the board, and appointment of an administrator. It directed the company to deposit sale proceeds with a nationalized bank, distribute interest among members, and appointed an independent chartered accountant to verify accounts. The court found no grounds for a Central Government investigation, emphasizing the need for the petitioner to approach the court in good faith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 540 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197490</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s claims regarding the sale of the property, reconstitution of the board, and appointment of an administrator. It directed the company to deposit sale proceeds with a nationalized bank, distribute interest among members, and appointed an independent chartered accountant to verify accounts. The court found no grounds for a Central Government investigation, emphasizing the need for the petitioner to approach the court in good faith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>