https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197488 Section 30(1) of the Sale of Goods Act is discussed as applying only where a seller in possession makes a voluntary transfer capable of passing title; hypothecation is distinguished from pledge and mortgage because it confers no property right or possessory interest, and a transfer under a court decree or by a Receiver is outside the provision. The text also notes that a prior purchaser proved ownership of the disputed movables, but possession was decreed only for the item actually identified as having reached the company defendant, while relief for the remaining articles was left against the original seller. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2019 18:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197488 Section 30(1) of the Sale of Goods Act is discussed as applying only where a seller in possession makes a voluntary transfer capable of passing title; hypothecation is distinguished from pledge and mortgage because it confers no property right or possessory interest, and a transfer under a court decree or by a Receiver is outside the provision. The text also notes that a prior purchaser proved ownership of the disputed movables, but possession was decreed only for the item actually identified as having reached the company defendant, while relief for the remaining articles was left against the original seller. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197488