<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 44 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11343</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the order dated March 29, 2001, and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for reconsideration in accordance with the observations made. The decision was based on the grounds of improper application of section 254(2) and the necessity for the Tribunal to rectify mistakes apparent on the record before passing an amended order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 44 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11343</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the order dated March 29, 2001, and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for reconsideration in accordance with the observations made. The decision was based on the grounds of improper application of section 254(2) and the necessity for the Tribunal to rectify mistakes apparent on the record before passing an amended order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>