<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 914 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197483</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the amendment to the Karnataka Electricity Board Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, 1969, providing a 1:1 ratio for promotion between technically qualified direct recruits and technically unqualified promotees was not discriminatory and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court was justified in setting aside the judgment of the Single Judge. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 17:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 914 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197483</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the amendment to the Karnataka Electricity Board Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, 1969, providing a 1:1 ratio for promotion between technically qualified direct recruits and technically unqualified promotees was not discriminatory and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court was justified in setting aside the judgment of the Single Judge. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>