<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11342</link>
    <description>The court clarified that the notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act must be issued only when the conditions in Section 147 are met. It emphasized that the Assessing Officer must disclose reasons for reopening the assessment to prevent arbitrary exercise of jurisdiction. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the notice was not estopped by submitting returns. Following guidelines from a Supreme Court decision, the court directed the Assessing Officer to communicate reasons for reopening, allow objections, and issue a speaking order before reassessment. The interim order was modified to ensure compliance and prevent adverse actions without court approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11342</link>
      <description>The court clarified that the notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act must be issued only when the conditions in Section 147 are met. It emphasized that the Assessing Officer must disclose reasons for reopening the assessment to prevent arbitrary exercise of jurisdiction. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the notice was not estopped by submitting returns. Following guidelines from a Supreme Court decision, the court directed the Assessing Officer to communicate reasons for reopening, allow objections, and issue a speaking order before reassessment. The interim order was modified to ensure compliance and prevent adverse actions without court approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>