<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 534 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197476</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the petitioner failed to prove that the transfer deeds were unstamped, rendering the transfer invalid under Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956. Lack of original transfer instruments and cooperation from the company and respondents 6 and 7 weakened the petitioner&#039;s case. Consequently, the court did not grant the requested reliefs for rectification of the register of members, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 15:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 534 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197476</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the petitioner failed to prove that the transfer deeds were unstamped, rendering the transfer invalid under Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956. Lack of original transfer instruments and cooperation from the company and respondents 6 and 7 weakened the petitioner&#039;s case. Consequently, the court did not grant the requested reliefs for rectification of the register of members, and the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>