https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197474 The court upheld the validity of the family settlement dated November 4, 1994, finding it binding and enforceable. It ruled that the defendants had the financial capacity to pay maintenance of Rs. 40,000/- per month. The mis-joinder of causes of action argument was dismissed as permission had been granted to file the suit on multiple grounds. The request to recall the order was rejected as compliance was noted. The application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was also dismissed. The plaintiffs were granted interim maintenance and directed to clear arrears and fulfill other settlement terms within two months. en-us Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:57:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197474 The court upheld the validity of the family settlement dated November 4, 1994, finding it binding and enforceable. It ruled that the defendants had the financial capacity to pay maintenance of Rs. 40,000/- per month. The mis-joinder of causes of action argument was dismissed as permission had been granted to file the suit on multiple grounds. The request to recall the order was rejected as compliance was noted. The application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was also dismissed. The plaintiffs were granted interim maintenance and directed to clear arrears and fulfill other settlement terms within two months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197474