<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 1010 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197472</link>
    <description>The court dismissed Company Petition No. 27 of 2007 as not maintainable under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the petitioners not meeting the qualification requirements under Section 399 and approaching the Company Law Board with unclean hands. The court also found no evidence of oppression and mismanagement on merit. All interim orders were lifted, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 1010 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197472</link>
      <description>The court dismissed Company Petition No. 27 of 2007 as not maintainable under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to the petitioners not meeting the qualification requirements under Section 399 and approaching the Company Law Board with unclean hands. The court also found no evidence of oppression and mismanagement on merit. All interim orders were lifted, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>