<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1064 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that notional interest on interest-free deposits should not be added to the rent received for determining the annual value under section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the annual value should be based on municipal valuation and not on notional interest, citing various judicial precedents. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 11:02:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1064 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that notional interest on interest-free deposits should not be added to the rent received for determining the annual value under section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the annual value should be based on municipal valuation and not on notional interest, citing various judicial precedents. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>