<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 335 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the assessee&#039;s explanation for cash deposits satisfactory and overturning the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the provided evidence adequately addressed concerns raised by the CIT(A), deleting the addition made by the A.O. The decision emphasized that the source of cash deposits was sufficiently explained, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:21:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 335 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the assessee&#039;s explanation for cash deposits satisfactory and overturning the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the provided evidence adequately addressed concerns raised by the CIT(A), deleting the addition made by the A.O. The decision emphasized that the source of cash deposits was sufficiently explained, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>