<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 334 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353598</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the AO, prior to 01.06.2015, lacked the authority to levy late filing fees under Section 234E while processing TDS statements. The amendment to Section 200A was deemed procedural, and the power to charge fees under Section 234E only applied from 01.06.2015. Consequently, the demand for fees under Section 234E was deemed invalid, leading to the deletion of penalties and allowing the appeals of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 334 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353598</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the AO, prior to 01.06.2015, lacked the authority to levy late filing fees under Section 234E while processing TDS statements. The amendment to Section 200A was deemed procedural, and the power to charge fees under Section 234E only applied from 01.06.2015. Consequently, the demand for fees under Section 234E was deemed invalid, leading to the deletion of penalties and allowing the appeals of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>