<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353589</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer/Appellate Officer to reconsider the inclusion of certain comparables following the guidelines laid down by the Delhi High Court, rectify the double counting of ESOP expenses, and treat foreign exchange fluctuation gain/loss as an operating item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:44:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353589</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer/Appellate Officer to reconsider the inclusion of certain comparables following the guidelines laid down by the Delhi High Court, rectify the double counting of ESOP expenses, and treat foreign exchange fluctuation gain/loss as an operating item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>