<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353583</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the non-compete fees of Rs. 40.50 crore were a capital receipt not taxable under Section 28(va) or chargeable under LTCG. Additionally, the ITAT deleted the disallowance of Rs. 7,60,656/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:32:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353583</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the non-compete fees of Rs. 40.50 crore were a capital receipt not taxable under Section 28(va) or chargeable under LTCG. Additionally, the ITAT deleted the disallowance of Rs. 7,60,656/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>