https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353576 The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts in a Criminal Revision Case where the accused challenged his conviction, sentence, and fine related to a dishonored cheque. The defense's arguments on the presumption of debt under the Negotiable Instruments Act were refuted, as the accused failed to provide evidence to disprove the existence of a promissory note. The courts found in favor of the complainant, affirming the conviction and sentence due to the accused's failure to meet the burden of proof. The Criminal Revision Petition was dismissed, and the complainant was entitled to the presumption under the Act. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353576 The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts in a Criminal Revision Case where the accused challenged his conviction, sentence, and fine related to a dishonored cheque. The defense's arguments on the presumption of debt under the Negotiable Instruments Act were refuted, as the accused failed to provide evidence to disprove the existence of a promissory note. The courts found in favor of the complainant, affirming the conviction and sentence due to the accused's failure to meet the burden of proof. The Criminal Revision Petition was dismissed, and the complainant was entitled to the presumption under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353576