<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 311 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353575</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the second appeal, affirming the judgments and decrees of the lower courts. It held that the plaintiff had successfully established the existence of a valid contract and debt, and the defendants were legally bound to discharge the debt. The substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the plaintiff, and the second appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 311 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353575</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the second appeal, affirming the judgments and decrees of the lower courts. It held that the plaintiff had successfully established the existence of a valid contract and debt, and the defendants were legally bound to discharge the debt. The substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the plaintiff, and the second appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>