<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353574</link>
    <description>Statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is treated as duly served where it is sent to the correct address, minor pin-code error does not defeat service, intimation is delivered, and the addressee fails to collect the registered article. The presumption arising from registered post and the doctrine of deemed service were applied to reject the claim of defective notice. On that basis, the concurrent findings were found free from illegality, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 310 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353574</link>
      <description>Statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is treated as duly served where it is sent to the correct address, minor pin-code error does not defeat service, intimation is delivered, and the addressee fails to collect the registered article. The presumption arising from registered post and the doctrine of deemed service were applied to reject the claim of defective notice. On that basis, the concurrent findings were found free from illegality, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>