https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353565 The appeals were allowed, setting aside the redemption fine on the seized goods and the penalty on the co-appellant. The Tribunal found that without a show cause notice for extending seizure, the goods should have been released unconditionally. As the goods were not available without any conditions, no redemption fine could be imposed. Additionally, since the co-appellant's role was not specified and no statement was recorded, the penalty imposed on them was set aside. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:15:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353565 The appeals were allowed, setting aside the redemption fine on the seized goods and the penalty on the co-appellant. The Tribunal found that without a show cause notice for extending seizure, the goods should have been released unconditionally. As the goods were not available without any conditions, no redemption fine could be imposed. Additionally, since the co-appellant's role was not specified and no statement was recorded, the penalty imposed on them was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353565