https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353560 The case involved an appeal against the appropriation of an outstanding amount against a rebate claim. The appellant argued that the demand notice for recovery was time-barred, rendering the appropriation unlawful. However, the Revenue contended that the appropriation was justified as the appellant failed to pay the amount. The Commissioner upheld the appropriation, stating the appellant did not prove the amount was not due. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the appropriation of the outstanding amount against the rebate claim. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:14:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353560 The case involved an appeal against the appropriation of an outstanding amount against a rebate claim. The appellant argued that the demand notice for recovery was time-barred, rendering the appropriation unlawful. However, the Revenue contended that the appropriation was justified as the appellant failed to pay the amount. The Commissioner upheld the appropriation, stating the appellant did not prove the amount was not due. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the appropriation of the outstanding amount against the rebate claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353560