<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 293 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Authority for a fresh decision regarding the appellant&#039;s eligibility for a refund of differential Central Excise duty on coal cleared due to non-payment by buyers. Emphasizing the importance of supporting documents, the Tribunal instructed a thorough examination of the claims based on the correct assessable value and payment realization. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present their case adequately, with the Original Authority directed to expedite the decision within three months. The appeals were allowed for remand to reevaluate the refund claims based on clarified criteria and submission of necessary supporting documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 293 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Authority for a fresh decision regarding the appellant&#039;s eligibility for a refund of differential Central Excise duty on coal cleared due to non-payment by buyers. Emphasizing the importance of supporting documents, the Tribunal instructed a thorough examination of the claims based on the correct assessable value and payment realization. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present their case adequately, with the Original Authority directed to expedite the decision within three months. The appeals were allowed for remand to reevaluate the refund claims based on clarified criteria and submission of necessary supporting documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>