<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 20 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11333</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s broad powers to consider additional grounds in appeals. The Court directed the Tribunal to review the new grounds raised by the assessee. However, the issue of deductibility of interest paid on money borrowed for property construction remained unresolved pending the Tribunal&#039;s reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 20 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11333</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the Tribunal&#039;s broad powers to consider additional grounds in appeals. The Court directed the Tribunal to review the new grounds raised by the assessee. However, the issue of deductibility of interest paid on money borrowed for property construction remained unresolved pending the Tribunal&#039;s reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>