<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1261 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claims for temporary site accommodation and shuttering, centering, scaffolding expenses, following the rule of consistency. However, it upheld the disallowance of prior period expenses and provision for foreseen loss due to lack of evidence. The appeal regarding pension contribution was dismissed due to the low tax effect. The deduction under Section 80-IA was allowed, following previous years&#039; decisions. The issue of TDS disallowance was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1261 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claims for temporary site accommodation and shuttering, centering, scaffolding expenses, following the rule of consistency. However, it upheld the disallowance of prior period expenses and provision for foreseen loss due to lack of evidence. The appeal regarding pension contribution was dismissed due to the low tax effect. The deduction under Section 80-IA was allowed, following previous years&#039; decisions. The issue of TDS disallowance was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>