<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 11 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11327</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Department, denying the deletion of additions on gifts and presents as entertainment expenditure. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the additions was deemed erroneous, and the reference was disposed of accordingly. The court emphasized the broader interpretation of entertainment expenditure, considering gifts and presents as falling within the ambit of such expenses, in line with legislative intent to restrict such expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 11 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11327</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Department, denying the deletion of additions on gifts and presents as entertainment expenditure. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the additions was deemed erroneous, and the reference was disposed of accordingly. The court emphasized the broader interpretation of entertainment expenditure, considering gifts and presents as falling within the ambit of such expenses, in line with legislative intent to restrict such expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>