<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 283 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353547</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed in a case concerning additions on account of alleged bogus purchases for AY 2013-14. The Ld. CIT(A) partially allowed the assessee&#039;s contentions, reducing the additions to 3%. However, after considering arguments and evidence, the additions were enhanced to 6% of alleged bogus purchases due to doubts raised regarding the transactions. The modified order was pronounced on December 13, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2018 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 283 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353547</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed in a case concerning additions on account of alleged bogus purchases for AY 2013-14. The Ld. CIT(A) partially allowed the assessee&#039;s contentions, reducing the additions to 3%. However, after considering arguments and evidence, the additions were enhanced to 6% of alleged bogus purchases due to doubts raised regarding the transactions. The modified order was pronounced on December 13, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>