https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197448 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, concurring with the High Court's decision that the equitable relief of injunction should not have been granted to the Appellant. The respondent-tenant was granted liberty to seek possession of the land in accordance with law. The Court reiterated that the Appellant, having invoked the jurisdiction of the tenancy authorities, could not challenge their jurisdiction after losing the appeal. The directions issued by the High Court for delivering possession were deemed unnecessary, as the pending proceedings should be completed in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 16:44:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197448 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, concurring with the High Court's decision that the equitable relief of injunction should not have been granted to the Appellant. The respondent-tenant was granted liberty to seek possession of the land in accordance with law. The Court reiterated that the Appellant, having invoked the jurisdiction of the tenancy authorities, could not challenge their jurisdiction after losing the appeal. The directions issued by the High Court for delivering possession were deemed unnecessary, as the pending proceedings should be completed in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197448