https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197447 Actual work for 240 days in a period of twelve calendar months is deemed to satisfy the requirement of one year's continuous service for retrenchment under section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even where employment was interrupted by breaks. Section 25B creates a statutory fiction that such service counts as continuous service, and the broader definition in section 2(eee) cannot be applied to defeat that deeming provision. The 1964 amendments were treated as clarificatory, not as changing the rule. On that basis, termination without compliance with section 25F's mandatory conditions was invalid. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 16:26:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197447 Actual work for 240 days in a period of twelve calendar months is deemed to satisfy the requirement of one year's continuous service for retrenchment under section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, even where employment was interrupted by breaks. Section 25B creates a statutory fiction that such service counts as continuous service, and the broader definition in section 2(eee) cannot be applied to defeat that deeming provision. The 1964 amendments were treated as clarificatory, not as changing the rule. On that basis, termination without compliance with section 25F's mandatory conditions was invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197447