https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197446 The court allowed the application under Section 8, referring the parties to arbitration. It held that the question of whether the ISDA Master Agreement was null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed should be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal. The court emphasized the separability doctrine and the legislative intent to minimize judicial intervention in arbitration matters. The application was allowed, and the dispute was referred to arbitration as per the ISDA Master Agreement. en-us Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 16:17:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197446 The court allowed the application under Section 8, referring the parties to arbitration. It held that the question of whether the ISDA Master Agreement was null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed should be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal. The court emphasized the separability doctrine and the legislative intent to minimize judicial intervention in arbitration matters. The application was allowed, and the dispute was referred to arbitration as per the ISDA Master Agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197446