https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197445 The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Industrial Court's order dated 22nd October 1993. It held that the petitioner was entitled to reinstatement as a permanent employee from 30th January 1987 and that the first respondent had engaged in unfair labour practices. The petitioner, having retired on 15th July 1991, was entitled to monetary benefits accruing from his status as a permanent employee, to be paid within three months, failing which they would carry simple interest at 12% per annum. The first respondent was also ordered to pay the costs of the writ petition, quantified at Rs. 500. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 16:16:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197445 The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Industrial Court's order dated 22nd October 1993. It held that the petitioner was entitled to reinstatement as a permanent employee from 30th January 1987 and that the first respondent had engaged in unfair labour practices. The petitioner, having retired on 15th July 1991, was entitled to monetary benefits accruing from his status as a permanent employee, to be paid within three months, failing which they would carry simple interest at 12% per annum. The first respondent was also ordered to pay the costs of the writ petition, quantified at Rs. 500. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197445