https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197443 The appellant challenged an acquittal order in a Criminal Case under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881. The proviso to Section 372, Cr.P.C. allows victims to appeal against acquittal orders, with such appeals heard by the Sessions Court. The High Court's jurisdiction over appeals against acquittals under Section 378(4), Cr.P.C. is superseded by the proviso to Section 372, which grants this jurisdiction to the Sessions Court. The appellant should have first approached the Sessions Court before the High Court, unless exceptional grounds exist. The petition for leave to appeal is returned to the petitioner to be presented before the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara, without affecting the law of limitation. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:20:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197443 The appellant challenged an acquittal order in a Criminal Case under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881. The proviso to Section 372, Cr.P.C. allows victims to appeal against acquittal orders, with such appeals heard by the Sessions Court. The High Court's jurisdiction over appeals against acquittals under Section 378(4), Cr.P.C. is superseded by the proviso to Section 372, which grants this jurisdiction to the Sessions Court. The appellant should have first approached the Sessions Court before the High Court, unless exceptional grounds exist. The petition for leave to appeal is returned to the petitioner to be presented before the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara, without affecting the law of limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197443