https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197441 The court upheld the Company Law Board's decision to refer disputes covered by the arbitration clause in the sponsorship agreement to arbitration while retaining jurisdiction over independent allegations of oppression and mismanagement under Section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the CLB's approach was justified and dismissed the appeal, affirming the bifurcation of issues based on the arbitration clause and statutory provisions of the Companies Act. en-us Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 May 2019 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197441 The court upheld the Company Law Board's decision to refer disputes covered by the arbitration clause in the sponsorship agreement to arbitration while retaining jurisdiction over independent allegations of oppression and mismanagement under Section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the CLB's approach was justified and dismissed the appeal, affirming the bifurcation of issues based on the arbitration clause and statutory provisions of the Companies Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197441