<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 841 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197440</link>
    <description>In a complaint case, a complainant&#039;s challenge to an acquittal lies by seeking special leave to appeal before the High Court under Section 378(4) CrPC, as settled by the Supreme Court&#039;s binding clarification. The earlier view that the complainant could proceed as a victim under Section 372 CrPC does not prevail where that clarification governs. The discussion therefore confirms that the proper forum for leave to appeal against acquittal in a complaint case is the High Court, not the Sessions Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 841 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197440</link>
      <description>In a complaint case, a complainant&#039;s challenge to an acquittal lies by seeking special leave to appeal before the High Court under Section 378(4) CrPC, as settled by the Supreme Court&#039;s binding clarification. The earlier view that the complainant could proceed as a victim under Section 372 CrPC does not prevail where that clarification governs. The discussion therefore confirms that the proper forum for leave to appeal against acquittal in a complaint case is the High Court, not the Sessions Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>