https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197438 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of duty demand proposals against two parties, SVA Steel Re-rolling Mills Limited and Srinivasa Steel Rolling Mills, due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper explanation of allegations in the Show Cause Notice. The Commissioner's decision was based on the inadequacy of evidence, lack of clear reasoning, and shabby drafting of the statement of facts and appeal grounds. The Tribunal found the evidence presented did not sufficiently support the alleged duty evasion, leading to the rejection of the appeal. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197438 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of duty demand proposals against two parties, SVA Steel Re-rolling Mills Limited and Srinivasa Steel Rolling Mills, due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper explanation of allegations in the Show Cause Notice. The Commissioner's decision was based on the inadequacy of evidence, lack of clear reasoning, and shabby drafting of the statement of facts and appeal grounds. The Tribunal found the evidence presented did not sufficiently support the alleged duty evasion, leading to the rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197438