<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 777 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197436</link>
    <description>The court dismissed leave to appeal applications by complainants in a case involving Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. It emphasized that victims, including those suffering losses from dishonored cheques, have the right to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. Appeals in such cases should be filed before the court of Sessions, not directly to the High Court. The court advised the appellants to file appeals properly and return certified copies of the judgment and vakalatnamas to their counsel, allowing for condonation of delay. The judgment clarifies the jurisdiction for appeals in Section 138 cases, stressing compliance with Section 372 Cr.P.C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 777 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197436</link>
      <description>The court dismissed leave to appeal applications by complainants in a case involving Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. It emphasized that victims, including those suffering losses from dishonored cheques, have the right to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. Appeals in such cases should be filed before the court of Sessions, not directly to the High Court. The court advised the appellants to file appeals properly and return certified copies of the judgment and vakalatnamas to their counsel, allowing for condonation of delay. The judgment clarifies the jurisdiction for appeals in Section 138 cases, stressing compliance with Section 372 Cr.P.C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>