<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 22 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11323</link>
    <description>The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the income-tax appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to provide material evidence or satisfactory explanations for the delay in filing the appeal. The judgment underscores the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and complying with procedural requirements in tax assessments and appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 22 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11323</link>
      <description>The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the income-tax appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to provide material evidence or satisfactory explanations for the delay in filing the appeal. The judgment underscores the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and complying with procedural requirements in tax assessments and appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>