<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 968 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197435</link>
    <description>The court found Mr. R.K. Anand and Mr. I.U. Khan guilty of criminal contempt for actions interfering with justice in the BMW case. NDTV was not held in contempt, emphasizing responsible media conduct. Video recordings were deemed reliable evidence, legal standards for contempt upheld. Punishment included a four-month ban from courts, loss of Senior Advocate status, and a fine. The severity aimed to uphold judicial integrity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 13:13:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 968 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197435</link>
      <description>The court found Mr. R.K. Anand and Mr. I.U. Khan guilty of criminal contempt for actions interfering with justice in the BMW case. NDTV was not held in contempt, emphasizing responsible media conduct. Video recordings were deemed reliable evidence, legal standards for contempt upheld. Punishment included a four-month ban from courts, loss of Senior Advocate status, and a fine. The severity aimed to uphold judicial integrity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>