https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197434 The High Court of Bombay found that the appeal filed by the original complainant, claiming to be a victim under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was not maintainable. The Court declared the proceedings before the Court of Sessions null and void, quashed the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, and directed the complainant to file an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code to challenge the acquittal of the original accused. The Revision Application was successful, setting aside the order of the Additional Sessions Judge. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 12:45:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197434 The High Court of Bombay found that the appeal filed by the original complainant, claiming to be a victim under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was not maintainable. The Court declared the proceedings before the Court of Sessions null and void, quashed the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, and directed the complainant to file an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code to challenge the acquittal of the original accused. The Revision Application was successful, setting aside the order of the Additional Sessions Judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197434