https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197429 A dishonoured cheque holder was treated as a victim for purposes of the proviso to Section 372 CrPC because cheque dishonour causes injury to the holder's property interest. Reading the victim definition in Section 2(wa) with the Code and the IPC definitions of injury and movable property, the Court held that the complainant could invoke the victim's right of appeal. It further held that Section 378(4) did not govern such an appeal in this setting, so leave to appeal was unnecessary. The result was that the challenge to the appellate order failed and the appeal by the cheque holder was maintainable. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:42:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197429 A dishonoured cheque holder was treated as a victim for purposes of the proviso to Section 372 CrPC because cheque dishonour causes injury to the holder's property interest. Reading the victim definition in Section 2(wa) with the Code and the IPC definitions of injury and movable property, the Court held that the complainant could invoke the victim's right of appeal. It further held that Section 378(4) did not govern such an appeal in this setting, so leave to appeal was unnecessary. The result was that the challenge to the appellate order failed and the appeal by the cheque holder was maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197429