<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 710 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197428</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 376 (2)(g) IPC and instead convicted the appellants under Section 354 read with Section 34 IPC. The custodial sentence was reduced to two years each, with a fine of Rs. 500 each and a default stipulation of three months rigorous imprisonment in case of failure to pay the fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:22:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=503380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 710 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197428</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 376 (2)(g) IPC and instead convicted the appellants under Section 354 read with Section 34 IPC. The custodial sentence was reduced to two years each, with a fine of Rs. 500 each and a default stipulation of three months rigorous imprisonment in case of failure to pay the fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>