https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197427 Credible prosecutrix testimony, supported by injury evidence, a torn hymen, fresh bleeding and difficulty inserting a finger into the vaginal orifice, was treated as sufficient to prove penetration. The Court applied the distinction between preparation, attempt and completed rape, and held that penetration, not ejaculation, is the sine qua non of rape under the Penal Code. On the materials recorded, the conduct amounted to actual sexual intercourse rather than only outraging modesty or an attempted offence, so the conviction for rape was upheld and the alternative submissions under the lesser provisions were rejected. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jan 2018 11:18:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197427 Credible prosecutrix testimony, supported by injury evidence, a torn hymen, fresh bleeding and difficulty inserting a finger into the vaginal orifice, was treated as sufficient to prove penetration. The Court applied the distinction between preparation, attempt and completed rape, and held that penetration, not ejaculation, is the sine qua non of rape under the Penal Code. On the materials recorded, the conduct amounted to actual sexual intercourse rather than only outraging modesty or an attempted offence, so the conviction for rape was upheld and the alternative submissions under the lesser provisions were rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197427